.
hbriefs heading animation Search for cases summary on Hbriefs like hbriefs on facebook follow hbriefs on twitter

BOOK: First 2-Years as a Law Student: Experiences and Lessons - visit website

JUMP TO CONTENT

Thomas E. Dowling v. Inspector-General of Police (1961) - CA


place advert here


icon CASE SUMMARY OF:

Thomas E. Dowling v. Inspector-General of Police (1961) - CA

by PaulPipar
icon THEME(S)

Blackmailer;
Interference with lower court;

icon PARTIES


icon CITATION

(1961) All N.L.R. 811;
icon COURT

High Court of Lagos;
icon LEAD JUDGEMENT DELIVERED BY:


icon LAWYERS WHO ADVOCATED

* FOR THE APPELLANT
* FOR THE RESPONDENT

The member(s) and administrator(s) of HCB put in energy in order to provide the cases summary they do on this online platform. We desist from charging you a fee, and we have decided to keep this online platform free and accessible for as long as we deem fit. However, in order to keep alive the impetus that makes us provide these free services, kindly make a donation, if you can.
Bank: Zenith Bank.
Name: Branham Paul Chima.
Account No.: 2178756839.


icon FACT

"The circumstances of the cases are somewhat unusual. It would appear that after committing the act of which he was convicted, the appellant was blackmailed by his accomplice. So on advice he went to the police for protection and made a full and free confession.

A trap was laid by the police and I am informed that the alleged blackmailer was caught. Both the appellant and the blackmailer were then prosecuted separately into two different courts presumably on different charges. The appellant pleaded guilty and was sentenced.

The cases of the blackmailer has not yet been tried."
icon ISSUE(S)


icon HOLDING & RATIO DECIDENDI

[APPEAL: DISMISSED]


icon REFERENCED


icon SOME PROVISIONS


icon RELEVANT CASES


Get that your business, idea, or work available to the public. HCB gets sufficient amount of visits daily. Utilise this golden opportunity to make your product(s) available to the public domain by advertising on this website. If you are interested in advertising on this platform, click "place my advert".

place my advert

place advert here
Go to Crowdfire


icon NOTABLE DICTA

* PROCEDURAL

* SUBSTANTIVE

Where a person who is being blackmailed seeks police protection, the proper course is for the police to investigate the complaint and, if satisfied that there is sufficient evidence, to prosecute the blackmailer.

Only after the trial of the blackmailer should the question of prosecuting the victim be considered, and, in practice, it is only in exceptional cases that it is advisable to do so. - De Lestang, CJ. Dowling v. IGP (1961)

Whether a prosecution should be instituted or not in any given cases is of course a matter entirely for the Director of Public Prosecutions and the duty of the courts is solely to try the cases in accordance with the Law and impose the appropriate sentence. - De Lestang, CJ. Dowling v. IGP (1961)

The court will not interfere with the sentence unless it is manifestly excessive in the circumstances of the cases or wrong in principle. - De Lestang, CJ. Dowling v. IGP (1961)
The end of this brief.


If this brief was aidful to you, LIKE Hbriefs on Facebook and FOLLOW Hbriefs on Twitter to get frequent Legal updates from Hbriefs.
kind_emoji


place advert here




USE THE SEARCH BOX BELOW
If the search box is not available below, it is due to network issues; in that case, reload page or check back again.
The search feature works perfect! Although the search feature might not capture very recent uploaded cases; If you did not get a particular case, we recommend entering the Case Summary categories and use your browser search/find feature, or use the request feature below.


JUMP TO TOP


REQUEST A CASE SUMMARY





ABOUT



TERMS AND CONDITONS



ADVERTISE ON HBRIEFS



FOUNDER




Humongouz Empire
© 2018 - 2021

website developed by hzztudio